
Here is my movie review for the February issue of
Angel's Heart Monthly:
Transformers epitomizes the very worst of blockbuster movie-making, an assault on the senses and an insult to the intellect. One needs not to know more than its title to learn of its purpose, but I dare say the filmmakers are aiming at something nobler than showing automobiles turning into robots. In fact, on a deeper level, the movie is about one teenage boy's unflinching quest to procure the hottest wheels in town and the hottest girl in school (in that order), and along the path of his chivalrous pursuit, he just happens to meet a bunch of really cool robots that frequently undergo metamorphosis for no apparent reasons. Of course, some robots are good and some robots are bad. Being the good boy that he is, our precocious protagonist obviously sides with the good ones. After more than a few mighty explosions, the boy finally saves the Earth and conquers the girl. And, yes, he gets to keep the robots too.
When I first watched a segment of this movie during a Christmas house party, I was dumbfounded by the sheer ineptitude of the show and the utter lack of judgment of the parents present. It is fascinating how so much money can be wasted to create something so inconsequential, so lack of ambition and creativity. I have nothing against summer blockbusters, but, really, do I have to suffer through such ludicrous and juvenile story line to be mildly amused by a few monotonous and ultimately exhausting action sequences? During my entire viewing experience, there was not a single moment that I cared about any of the characters, earthlings or robotic humanoids. I didn't come with the expectation to be inspired, but I also wasn't prepared to be denied of an engaging story. The movie is produced by Steven Spielberg (
Jaws,
E.T. ,
Minority Report), a filmmaker we can always count on to create blockbuster thrills with uncommon intelligence. Shame on him for allowing director Michael Bay (
Armageddon, Bad Boys) to deliver nothing more than a wet dream of a male teenager.
And what were the parents thinking of when they showed this movie in the Christmas party, where kids as young as my four-year-old boy was present? Wasn't it obvious the movie is not only devoid of any moral value (which I totally expected), but also an excuse for the filmmakers to display relentlessly their fetishes of the anatomy of the machinery and of the female gender? Or did they miss the many cheap laughs generated by the not-too-subtle racial stereotyping? Is it not enough for the film to be merely dumb, but dumb
and offensive? At the end I have no choice but to play the bad guy, and kindly asked the party host to stop playing the movie. I wondered, if the filmmakers have the insolence to manufacture such ineptitude and spend millions to market it to the very young ones, shouldn't they at least have the decency to make it suitable for family viewing? But at the end, the responsibility to protect the young minds rests firmly and squarely on the hands of the parents. One parent present at the party declared that her almost-teenage girl has watched this movie fifteen times, and I wondered what sort and degree of damage has been perpetually inflicted upon the girl's self body-image when she has to repeatedly witness the camera lingering on and caressing the picture-perfect female body via the sexist lens. I challenge all the Christ-following parents to stand up against the giant marketing machine and fight for cultural transformation, beginning within their own households.
Last summer, a self-declared movie-loving friend of mine lamented that after watching
Transformers, he has no other movies to look forward to for the rest of the year. This is a very bewildering statement, considering 2007 was one of the most luminous years for the movies in recent memory. There were instant American classic like
No Country for Old Men, unrelentingly ambitious morality tale like
There Will Be Blood, sweeping literary adaptation like
Atonement, wonderfully inspiring family entertainment like
Ratatouille, heartbreaking human drama like
Away from Her, and not to mention a wide array of lighter fares like
Juno and
Once that have gone on to become surprising critical darlings. To believe there was a lack of interesting movie offerings is to deny oneself of the opportunities to be amazed by the many possibilities of the cinema. Or maybe my dear friend has confused popularity with quality, and couldn't see beyond the neon signs of the ubiquitous marketing machine. If there is a way the audiences could become a cultural transformer, it would be in how we choose to skip movies like
Transformers and immerse ourselves in the blessed creativity of the good artists.